My cousin loves meth dealers, so do I
By John Lee
Pirate News TV
Some of my best gfs are currently spending years in prison for buying $5 of sudafed in walgreens n hosting bible home church, denied all medical care for epileptic seizures in prison from traumatic brain injury, comotose from stroke in prison, staph infection of heart in prison, psychotic hallucinations from child abuse, rape n solitary torture in prison, denied lawyer visits during trial in jail in madisonville Tn. Seems legit.
You will be happy to know that my cousin from madisonville Tn is fiting for rights of math deelers* at US supreme court. As an appellate judge she banned the illegal law in Tn requiring math deelers to pay income taxes, the crack tax it was called. She also disagreed with warrantless searches of meth labs based on reasonable suspicion n probable cause, at homes of meth dealers who post No Trespassing signs. (* Spelling required for prison censors)
My first cousin is now a justice on Tn supreme court, she literally threatens to sue me for saying that online, on irate voicemail messages she left on my phone lol. Thats because i wrote on my website that the Tn constitution requires all judges be elected, but Tn appoints supreme court judges then have fake election where nobody is allowed to run against them, thus the supreme court is a part of the executive n legislative branches, there is no judicial branch, thats communism, seems legit. All news corporations report on this strange fact, its not like im a lone nut crazy person.
My cousin is in the democrat party, and a satanic freemason in Eastern Star, which is now the pedophile cannibal pedovore communist party overthrowing usa by coronavirus bioweapon n martial law that now wants to ban grocery stores n ban all truckers, sems legit. The democrat party was the party of slaveowners 150 years ago where white ppl were slaves on plantations during the first Civil War, irish were the first slaves stripped naked in public n sold in usa. 300 years ago british royalty ate the brains of irish prisoners, just like the Frazzledrip snuf kiddy p0rn video seized by NYPD shows democrat hilary clinton eating the brains of living 10 year old girls chained to tree n bed in satanic ritual inside a pentagram then gutting them to wear their faces n intestines then slitting throats n drinkin blood as they die to get high on adrenochrome. President Trump, during his coronaflu briefings, while reporting on win military battles against presidential drug kingpins n sexslave traders to rescue child rape victims during the current Civil War, says he is retaliating against 3M corporation, which holds a patent on adrenochrome, for exporting surgical facemasks to foreign nations instead of selling them in usa during this socalled emergency plandemic.
My gf Stephanie Mendez was murdered this same way 6 months ago, proving republican politicians enjoy human sacrifice too, to harvest adrenochrome, which is a 3M patent manufactured in a bioweapons lab in wuhan china owned by democrat Nazi joo dictator george soros, distilled by vampyres from murdered christians.
Thats what this current civil war is about today, trump saying on tv that he shall arrest n execute hilary n her treasonous demoncrat minions, with military rescuing 1000s of child sexslaves in underground cities cannibalizing piles of dead bodies, thats why the military ordered 100,000 body bags this week, why trump said the death count will be horrifically high the next 2 weeks, hes not talking about coronavirus which kills nobody who gets chlorquinine. The new slavery is addiction. 250 years ago the british empire won Opium Wars to force china to be british slaves to addiction, tried the same in usa in revolutionary war n boston tea party.
Anyways this is a battle at u.s. supreme court over the rights of both probationers n all the ppl they live with. Its clear as mud whether this decision affects felons on parole, or just probationers of misdemeanors. Im the lone nut crazy person who says drugs are bad, they dont give freedom, they give slavery both financial n psychiatric plus dementia, and usually a home in a steel box, or coffin.
STATE OF TENNESSEE V. ANGELA CARRIE PAYTON HAMM AND DAVID LEE HAMM
State of Tennessee v. Angela Carrie Payton Hamm and David Lee Hamm
W2016-01282-SC-R11-CD
The Obion County Drug Task Force conducted a warrantless search of the residence of probationer Angela Hamm and her husband, David Hamm, which yielded illegal drugs and drug-related contraband. Defendant Angela Hamm had agreed, pursuant to probation conditions imposed in a prior case, to a warrantless search of her person, property, or vehicle at any time. We granted the State’s appeal in this case to consider whether the warrantless search of a probationer’s residence who is subject to a search condition requires officers to have reasonable suspicion of illegal activity prior to conducting the search. We conclude that it does not and therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment and the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision affirming the same.
ROGER A.PAGE,J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JEFFREY S.BIVINS, C.J., and HOLLY KIRBY,J., joined. CORNELIA A.CLARK,J., filed a separate dissenting opinion. SHARON G.LEE, J., also filed a separate dissenting opinion.
Date Filed:
November 21, 2019
20 pages
STATE OF TENNESSEE V. ANGELA CARRIE PAYTON HAMM AND DAVID LEE HAMM - DISSENTING
State of Tennessee v. Angela Carrie Payton Hamm and David Lee Hamm - Dissenting
W2016-01282-SC-R11-CD
One afternoon in November 2015, while David and Angela Hamm were not at home, four law enforcement officers entered and conducted a search of their home. The officers had neither a warrant nor reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Ms. Hamm was on probation; the officers used her probationary status to justify the intrusive home search. The majority’s decision to uphold this unreasonable search deprives Ms. Hamm and her husband of their rights to be free from unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution. The majority’s decision also casts a cloud over the lives of more than 65,000 Tennessee probationers and thousands of citizens living with probationers, all of whom are at risk of having their homes searched by law enforcement lacking reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. In sum, the majority’s decision to uphold the suspicionless search of the Hamms’ home violated the Hamms’ federal and state constitutional rights to be free from unreasonable searches. The United States Supreme Court can undo the injustice of the majority’s decision; let’s hope it does.
Authoring Judge:
Justice Sharon G. Lee
Date Filed:
November 21, 2019
17 pages
Tenn. Supreme Court Allows Police to Carry Out Warrantless, Suspicionless Searches of Probationers’ Homes, Undermining Fourth Amendment
Rutherford Institute
April 03, 2020
The amicus brief in Hamm v. State of Tennessee
WASHINGTON, DC — Pushing back against government efforts to chip away at the privacy and security guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment, The Rutherford Institute has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a state court decision allowing police to search the homes of probationers without any suspicion or justification. In an amicus brief filed in Hamm v. State of Tennessee, Institute attorneys have asked the Court to overturn a Tennessee court’s ruling that police have carte blanche to search the residence of probationers, arguing that it violates the Fourth Amendment’s overriding purpose to protect the sanctity and security of a person’s home.
Affiliate attorneys Michael Kimberly, Ethan Townsend, and Garrett R. Atherton of McDermott, Will & Emery LLP in Washington, D.C. assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in Hamm.
“The most fundamental guarantee of the Fourth Amendment is that the government may not rifle through a home without cause. This protection applies to every citizen and every home, no matter what the government might suggest to the contrary,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “In this age of overregulation and overcriminalization, where the average citizen unknowingly commits more than three felonies a day, it’s becoming all too easy for the government to label otherwise law-abiding Americans as criminals and strip them of their constitutional rights. The government must not be allowed to further breach the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless home invasions by police.”
In November 2015, Olbion County (Tenn.) County law enforcement officers received an unsubstantiated tip from a questionable source that persons in Olbion County were trafficking in methamphetamine. Although the informant did not identify the persons involved, police used the tip to justify a search of David Hamm’s residence. Hamm lived with his wife Angela, who was on probation for a conviction of manufacturing controlled substances that occurred before the couple were married, and their son. Although the officers had no warrant, they wrongly assumed the uncorroborated tip gave them reasonable suspicion to search the Hamms’ residence since, as condition of her probation, Angela had agreed to allow a warrantless search of her person or property by law enforcement officers. After being told by the Hamms’ son that his parents were not home, police entered the home through an unlocked door and conducted a warrantless search of the home where they found methamphetamine inside an eyeglass case. The police seized the drugs and charged the Hamms with violating state drug laws.
The trial court granted the Hamms’ motion to suppress the evidence seized during the warrantless search, ruling that even with Angela’s probation condition, the officers needed to have reasonable suspicion that there were drugs on the property, and the unreliable informant’s tip did not provide such suspicion. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Tennessee reversed the lower court ruling, finding that Angela’s probation condition allowed a search of the residence without any suspicion and for any reason. In its amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, The Rutherford Institute argues that the Fourth Amendment’s fundamental purpose is to protect the privacy of a person’s home, and probationers and their families retain the right to be free from arbitrary and unreasonable searches of their residences.
Pirate News TV
Some of my best gfs are currently spending years in prison for buying $5 of sudafed in walgreens n hosting bible home church, denied all medical care for epileptic seizures in prison from traumatic brain injury, comotose from stroke in prison, staph infection of heart in prison, psychotic hallucinations from child abuse, rape n solitary torture in prison, denied lawyer visits during trial in jail in madisonville Tn. Seems legit.
You will be happy to know that my cousin from madisonville Tn is fiting for rights of math deelers* at US supreme court. As an appellate judge she banned the illegal law in Tn requiring math deelers to pay income taxes, the crack tax it was called. She also disagreed with warrantless searches of meth labs based on reasonable suspicion n probable cause, at homes of meth dealers who post No Trespassing signs. (* Spelling required for prison censors)
My first cousin is now a justice on Tn supreme court, she literally threatens to sue me for saying that online, on irate voicemail messages she left on my phone lol. Thats because i wrote on my website that the Tn constitution requires all judges be elected, but Tn appoints supreme court judges then have fake election where nobody is allowed to run against them, thus the supreme court is a part of the executive n legislative branches, there is no judicial branch, thats communism, seems legit. All news corporations report on this strange fact, its not like im a lone nut crazy person.
My cousin is in the democrat party, and a satanic freemason in Eastern Star, which is now the pedophile cannibal pedovore communist party overthrowing usa by coronavirus bioweapon n martial law that now wants to ban grocery stores n ban all truckers, sems legit. The democrat party was the party of slaveowners 150 years ago where white ppl were slaves on plantations during the first Civil War, irish were the first slaves stripped naked in public n sold in usa. 300 years ago british royalty ate the brains of irish prisoners, just like the Frazzledrip snuf kiddy p0rn video seized by NYPD shows democrat hilary clinton eating the brains of living 10 year old girls chained to tree n bed in satanic ritual inside a pentagram then gutting them to wear their faces n intestines then slitting throats n drinkin blood as they die to get high on adrenochrome. President Trump, during his coronaflu briefings, while reporting on win military battles against presidential drug kingpins n sexslave traders to rescue child rape victims during the current Civil War, says he is retaliating against 3M corporation, which holds a patent on adrenochrome, for exporting surgical facemasks to foreign nations instead of selling them in usa during this socalled emergency plandemic.
My gf Stephanie Mendez was murdered this same way 6 months ago, proving republican politicians enjoy human sacrifice too, to harvest adrenochrome, which is a 3M patent manufactured in a bioweapons lab in wuhan china owned by democrat Nazi joo dictator george soros, distilled by vampyres from murdered christians.
President Trump: Democrats are trying to destroy America. This is treason.
Fake News: The punishment for treason in death. Are you suggesting the death penalty for democrat politicians?
Trump: Yes. We were attacked, like in 1917 [spanish flu bioweapon] we have to win the war. This is war in 144 nations. Our highest ranking general rescued a young lady in Honduras who was horribly mistreated for many years, every torture besides death, a famous case, you would recognize the name a very bloody battle.
Fake news: Military hospital warships are in port at NYC and LA, will you use them for coronavirus patients?
Trump: No. People can stay there haha.
Fake News: What is The Storm?
Trump: Yall will find out! We are going to be supplementing 1000s of soldiers to supplement the states. They are going into a war a battle theyve never really trained for. Nobodys trained for this nobodys seen this since 1917. This is the toughest week there will be alot of death unfortunately. We are learning about the invisible enemy. Tougher n smarter. A tough 2 weeks coming up.
Thats what this current civil war is about today, trump saying on tv that he shall arrest n execute hilary n her treasonous demoncrat minions, with military rescuing 1000s of child sexslaves in underground cities cannibalizing piles of dead bodies, thats why the military ordered 100,000 body bags this week, why trump said the death count will be horrifically high the next 2 weeks, hes not talking about coronavirus which kills nobody who gets chlorquinine. The new slavery is addiction. 250 years ago the british empire won Opium Wars to force china to be british slaves to addiction, tried the same in usa in revolutionary war n boston tea party.
Anyways this is a battle at u.s. supreme court over the rights of both probationers n all the ppl they live with. Its clear as mud whether this decision affects felons on parole, or just probationers of misdemeanors. Im the lone nut crazy person who says drugs are bad, they dont give freedom, they give slavery both financial n psychiatric plus dementia, and usually a home in a steel box, or coffin.
STATE OF TENNESSEE V. ANGELA CARRIE PAYTON HAMM AND DAVID LEE HAMM
State of Tennessee v. Angela Carrie Payton Hamm and David Lee Hamm
W2016-01282-SC-R11-CD
The Obion County Drug Task Force conducted a warrantless search of the residence of probationer Angela Hamm and her husband, David Hamm, which yielded illegal drugs and drug-related contraband. Defendant Angela Hamm had agreed, pursuant to probation conditions imposed in a prior case, to a warrantless search of her person, property, or vehicle at any time. We granted the State’s appeal in this case to consider whether the warrantless search of a probationer’s residence who is subject to a search condition requires officers to have reasonable suspicion of illegal activity prior to conducting the search. We conclude that it does not and therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment and the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision affirming the same.
ROGER A.PAGE,J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JEFFREY S.BIVINS, C.J., and HOLLY KIRBY,J., joined. CORNELIA A.CLARK,J., filed a separate dissenting opinion. SHARON G.LEE, J., also filed a separate dissenting opinion.
Date Filed:
November 21, 2019
20 pages
STATE OF TENNESSEE V. ANGELA CARRIE PAYTON HAMM AND DAVID LEE HAMM - DISSENTING
State of Tennessee v. Angela Carrie Payton Hamm and David Lee Hamm - Dissenting
W2016-01282-SC-R11-CD
One afternoon in November 2015, while David and Angela Hamm were not at home, four law enforcement officers entered and conducted a search of their home. The officers had neither a warrant nor reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Ms. Hamm was on probation; the officers used her probationary status to justify the intrusive home search. The majority’s decision to uphold this unreasonable search deprives Ms. Hamm and her husband of their rights to be free from unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution. The majority’s decision also casts a cloud over the lives of more than 65,000 Tennessee probationers and thousands of citizens living with probationers, all of whom are at risk of having their homes searched by law enforcement lacking reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. In sum, the majority’s decision to uphold the suspicionless search of the Hamms’ home violated the Hamms’ federal and state constitutional rights to be free from unreasonable searches. The United States Supreme Court can undo the injustice of the majority’s decision; let’s hope it does.
Authoring Judge:
Justice Sharon G. Lee
Date Filed:
November 21, 2019
17 pages
Tenn. Supreme Court Allows Police to Carry Out Warrantless, Suspicionless Searches of Probationers’ Homes, Undermining Fourth Amendment
Rutherford Institute
April 03, 2020
The amicus brief in Hamm v. State of Tennessee
WASHINGTON, DC — Pushing back against government efforts to chip away at the privacy and security guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment, The Rutherford Institute has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a state court decision allowing police to search the homes of probationers without any suspicion or justification. In an amicus brief filed in Hamm v. State of Tennessee, Institute attorneys have asked the Court to overturn a Tennessee court’s ruling that police have carte blanche to search the residence of probationers, arguing that it violates the Fourth Amendment’s overriding purpose to protect the sanctity and security of a person’s home.
Affiliate attorneys Michael Kimberly, Ethan Townsend, and Garrett R. Atherton of McDermott, Will & Emery LLP in Washington, D.C. assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in Hamm.
“The most fundamental guarantee of the Fourth Amendment is that the government may not rifle through a home without cause. This protection applies to every citizen and every home, no matter what the government might suggest to the contrary,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “In this age of overregulation and overcriminalization, where the average citizen unknowingly commits more than three felonies a day, it’s becoming all too easy for the government to label otherwise law-abiding Americans as criminals and strip them of their constitutional rights. The government must not be allowed to further breach the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless home invasions by police.”
In November 2015, Olbion County (Tenn.) County law enforcement officers received an unsubstantiated tip from a questionable source that persons in Olbion County were trafficking in methamphetamine. Although the informant did not identify the persons involved, police used the tip to justify a search of David Hamm’s residence. Hamm lived with his wife Angela, who was on probation for a conviction of manufacturing controlled substances that occurred before the couple were married, and their son. Although the officers had no warrant, they wrongly assumed the uncorroborated tip gave them reasonable suspicion to search the Hamms’ residence since, as condition of her probation, Angela had agreed to allow a warrantless search of her person or property by law enforcement officers. After being told by the Hamms’ son that his parents were not home, police entered the home through an unlocked door and conducted a warrantless search of the home where they found methamphetamine inside an eyeglass case. The police seized the drugs and charged the Hamms with violating state drug laws.
The trial court granted the Hamms’ motion to suppress the evidence seized during the warrantless search, ruling that even with Angela’s probation condition, the officers needed to have reasonable suspicion that there were drugs on the property, and the unreliable informant’s tip did not provide such suspicion. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Tennessee reversed the lower court ruling, finding that Angela’s probation condition allowed a search of the residence without any suspicion and for any reason. In its amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, The Rutherford Institute argues that the Fourth Amendment’s fundamental purpose is to protect the privacy of a person’s home, and probationers and their families retain the right to be free from arbitrary and unreasonable searches of their residences.
Comments
Post a Comment